UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-27754
HUB GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 36-4007085 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3050 Highland Parkway, Suite 100
Downers Grove, Illinois 60515
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
(630) 271-3600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer | x | Accelerated Filer | ¨ | |||
Non-Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Smaller Reporting Company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes ¨ No x
On July 25, 2012, the registrant had 37,110,806 outstanding shares of Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, and 662,296 outstanding shares of Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share.
HUB GROUP, INC.
Page | ||||
PART I. Financial Information: |
||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 |
3 | |||
4 | ||||
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsSix Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 |
5 | |||
6 | ||||
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and |
||||
12 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 |
2
HUB GROUP, INC.
(in thousands, except share amounts)
June 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 52,185 | $ | 49,091 | ||||
Accounts receivable trade, net |
357,645 | 326,537 | ||||||
Accounts receivable other |
22,658 | 23,878 | ||||||
Prepaid taxes |
1,003 | 2,392 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
5,523 | 4,838 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
12,386 | 9,056 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
451,400 | 415,792 | ||||||
Restricted investments |
15,436 | 14,323 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
131,988 | 124,587 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
20,842 | 21,667 | ||||||
Goodwill, net |
263,361 | 263,470 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,257 | 2,845 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 885,284 | $ | 842,684 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable trade |
$ | 211,067 | $ | 204,693 | ||||
Accounts payable other |
20,792 | 17,289 | ||||||
Accrued payroll |
12,465 | 16,721 | ||||||
Accrued other |
30,094 | 29,962 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease |
2,271 | 2,237 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
276,689 | 270,902 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities |
18,169 | 17,717 | ||||||
Non-current portion of capital lease |
22,279 | 23,436 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
96,757 | 91,764 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding in 2012 and 2011 |
| | ||||||
Common stock |
||||||||
Class A: $.01 par value; 97,337,700 shares authorized and 41,224,792 shares issued in 2012 and 2011; 37,111,252 outstanding in 2012 and 36,860,260 shares outstanding in 2011 |
412 | 412 | ||||||
Class B: $.01 par value; 662,300 shares authorized; 662,296 shares issued and outstanding in 2012 and 2011 |
7 | 7 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
164,459 | 168,800 | ||||||
Purchase price in excess of predecessor basis, net of tax benefit of $10,306 |
(15,458 | ) | (15,458 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
431,802 | 401,188 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
2 | 4 | ||||||
Treasury stock; at cost, 4,113,540 shares in 2012 and 4,364,532 shares in 2011 |
(109,834 | ) | (116,088 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
471,390 | 438,865 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 885,284 | $ | 842,684 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
HUB GROUP, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 778,312 | $ | 751,201 | $ | 1,518,197 | $ | 1,236,580 | ||||||||
Transportation costs |
690,954 | 666,472 | 1,347,097 | 1,094,544 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross margin |
87,358 | 84,729 | 171,100 | 142,036 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
31,436 | 32,722 | 64,735 | 59,523 | ||||||||||||
Agent fees and commissions |
13,601 | 13,765 | 27,296 | 14,516 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
12,734 | 12,852 | 25,311 | 24,911 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,737 | 1,472 | 3,397 | 2,408 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
59,508 | 60,811 | 120,739 | 101,358 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
27,850 | 23,918 | 50,361 | 40,678 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(301 | ) | (69 | ) | (608 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||||||
Interest and dividend income |
33 | 45 | 67 | 77 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
(18 | ) | 60 | (41 | ) | 269 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other (expense) income |
(286 | ) | 36 | (582 | ) | 263 | ||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
27,564 | 23,954 | 49,779 | 40,941 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
10,612 | 9,564 | 19,165 | 16,053 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,952 | $ | 14,390 | $ | 30,614 | $ | 24,888 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 16,949 | $ | 14,390 | $ | 30,612 | $ | 24,888 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding |
37,070 | 36,901 | 37,057 | 36,893 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding |
37,190 | 37,060 | 37,167 | 37,041 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
HUB GROUP, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 30,614 | $ | 24,888 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
11,004 | 6,292 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
4,432 | 2,733 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to share-based compensation plans |
3,229 | 2,433 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(48 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
(83 | ) | | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Restricted investments |
(1,113 | ) | (1,043 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(29,883 | ) | (62,743 | ) | ||||
Prepaid taxes |
1,389 | 169 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(3,329 | ) | (3,976 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
589 | 305 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
9,877 | 31,079 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
(741 | ) | 8,445 | |||||
Non-current liabilities |
200 | 1,400 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
26,137 | 9,974 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sale of equipment |
643 | 214 | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(21,043 | ) | (15,281 | ) | ||||
Cash used in acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(300 | ) | (90,909 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(20,700 | ) | (105,976 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
45 | 26 | ||||||
Stock tendered for payments of withholding taxes |
(1,770 | ) | (1,477 | ) | ||||
Capital lease payments |
(1,107 | ) | | |||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
492 | 584 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(2,340 | ) | (867 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(3 | ) | 4 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
3,094 | (96,865 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
49,091 | 115,144 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 52,185 | $ | 18,279 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash paid for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 626 | $ | 83 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 12,556 | $ | 7,529 |
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
HUB GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. Interim Financial Statements
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Hub Group, Inc. (we, us or our) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. However, we believe that the disclosures contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
The financial statements reflect, in our opinion, all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly present our financial position as of June 30, 2012 and results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Results of operations in interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year due partially to seasonality.
Reclassifications: Certain immaterial prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
NOTE 2. Acquisition
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for 2011 assume that the acquisition of Mode was completed as of January 1, 2011 (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
Six Months Ended | ||||
June 30, 2011 |
||||
Revenue |
$ | 1,414,858 | ||
Net income |
$ | 25,701 | ||
Earnings per share |
||||
Basic |
$ | 0.70 | ||
Diluted |
$ | 0.69 |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated results for the six month period was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting and are based on the historical financial information of Hub and Mode. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give effect to the pro forma adjustments that are: (i) directly attributable to the acquisition, (ii) factually supportable and (iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the consolidated results. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results are not necessarily indicative of what our consolidated results of operations actually would have been had we completed the acquisition on January 1, 2011.
NOTE 3. Business Segments
We report two distinct business segments. The first segment is Mode, which includes the Mode business we acquired on April 1, 2011. The second segment is Hub, which is all business other than Mode.
Mode has independent business owners who sell and operate the business throughout North America as well as sales only agents. Mode also has a company managed operation and corporate offices in Dallas, TX, a temperature protected services division, Temstar, located in Downers Grove, IL and corporate offices in Memphis, TN.
6
Mode markets and operates its freight transportation services, consisting of intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics, primarily through agents who enter into contractual arrangements with Mode.
Hub offers comprehensive intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics services. Our employees operate the freight through a network of operating centers located in the United States and Mexico. Each operating center is strategically located in a market with a significant concentration of shipping customers and one or more railheads. Hub has full time employees located throughout the United States and Mexico.
The following is a summary of operating results and certain other financial data for our business segments (in thousands):
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2012 | Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inter- | Hub | Inter- | Hub | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Group | Segment | Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 595,888 | $ | 194,292 | $ | (11,868 | ) | $ | 778,312 | $ | 560,418 | $ | 193,248 | $ | (2,465 | ) | $ | 751,201 | ||||||||||||||
Transportation costs |
531,080 | 171,742 | (11,868 | ) | 690,954 | 497,832 | 171,105 | (2,465 | ) | 666,472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
64,808 | 22,550 | | 87,358 | 62,586 | 22,143 | | 84,729 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
27,590 | 3,846 | | 31,436 | 28,111 | 4,611 | | 32,722 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agent fees and commissions |
490 | 13,111 | | 13,601 | 638 | 13,127 | | 13,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
10,707 | 2,027 | | 12,734 | 10,264 | 2,588 | | 12,852 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,099 | 638 | | 1,737 | 951 | 521 | | 1,472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
39,886 | 19,622 | | 59,508 | 39,964 | 20,847 | | 60,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 24,922 | $ | 2,928 | $ | | $ | 27,850 | $ | 22,622 | $ | 1,296 | $ | | $ | 23,918 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 3,580 | $ | 450 | $ | | $ | 4,030 | $ | 10,374 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | 10,401 |
The following tables summarize our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands):
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2012 | Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inter- | Hub | Inter- | Hub | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Group | Segment | Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intermodal |
$ | 431,894 | $ | 86,048 | $ | (10,931 | ) | $ | 507,011 | $ | 396,298 | $ | 85,150 | $ | (2,092 | ) | $ | 479,356 | ||||||||||||||
Truck brokerage |
80,094 | 81,379 | (581 | ) | 160,892 | 89,764 | 81,180 | (373 | ) | 170,571 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Logistics |
83,900 | 26,865 | (356 | ) | 110,409 | 74,356 | 26,918 | | 101,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 595,888 | $ | 194,292 | $ | (11,868 | ) | $ | 778,312 | $ | 560,418 | $ | 193,248 | $ | (2,465 | ) | $ | 751,201 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2012 | Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inter- | Hub | Inter- | Hub | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Group | Segment | Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 1,159,100 | $ | 381,475 | $ | (22,378 | ) | $ | 1,518,197 | $ | 1,045,797 | $ | 193,248 | $ | (2,465 | ) | $ | 1,236,580 | ||||||||||||||
Transportation costs |
1,032,773 | 336,702 | (22,378 | ) | 1,347,097 | 925,904 | 171,105 | (2,465 | ) | 1,094,544 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
126,327 | 44,773 | | 171,100 | 119,893 | 22,143 | | 142,036 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
56,671 | 8,064 | | 64,735 | 54,912 | 4,611 | | 59,523 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agent fees and commissions |
1,125 | 26,171 | | 27,296 | 1,389 | 13,127 | | 14,516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
21,438 | 3,873 | | 25,311 | 22,323 | 2,588 | | 24,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,221 | 1,176 | | 3,397 | 1,887 | 521 | | 2,408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
81,455 | 39,284 | | 120,739 | 80,511 | 20,847 | | 101,358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 44,872 | $ | 5,489 | $ | | $ | 50,361 | $ | 39,382 | $ | 1,296 | $ | | $ | 40,678 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 20,322 | $ | 721 | $ | | $ | 21,043 | $ | 15,254 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | 15,281 |
The following tables summarize our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands):
Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2012 | Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inter- | Hub | Inter- | Hub | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Group | Segment | Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intermodal |
$ | 836,064 | $ | 168,270 | $ | (20,173 | ) | $ | 984,161 | $ | 732,979 | $ | 85,150 | $ | (2,092 | ) | $ | 816,037 | ||||||||||||||
Truck brokerage |
160,118 | 161,316 | (1,543 | ) | 319,891 | 174,450 | 81,180 | (373 | ) | 255,257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Logistics |
162,918 | 51,889 | (662 | ) | 214,145 | 138,368 | 26,918 | | 165,286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 1,159,100 | $ | 381,475 | $ | (22,378 | ) | $ | 1,518,197 | $ | 1,045,797 | $ | 193,248 | $ | (2,465 | ) | $ | 1,236,580 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2012 | As of December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inter- | Hub | Inter- | Hub | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Group | Segment | Group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | Hub | Mode | Elims | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 729,117 | $ | 159,829 | $ | (3,662 | ) | $ | 885,284 | $ | 684,609 | $ | 162,972 | $ | (4,897 | ) | $ | 842,684 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 233,972 | $ | 29,389 | $ | | $ | 263,361 | $ | 234,081 | $ | 29,389 | $ | | $ | 263,470 |
8
NOTE 4. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of our earnings per share (in thousands, except for per share data):
Three Months Ended, June 30, | Six Months Ended, June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share |
$ | 16,952 | $ | 14,390 | $ | 30,614 | $ | 24,888 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
37,070 | 36,901 | 37,057 | 36,893 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock |
120 | 159 | 110 | 148 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
37,190 | 37,060 | 37,167 | 37,041 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per share basic |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. Restructuring Charges
Our remaining restructuring accrual as of June 30, 2012 was $0.05 million. This was a reduction from the December 31, 2011 accrual of $0.6 million due to cash payments made and changes in estimate, partially offset by restructuring expense during the first quarter.
All severance charges are included in salaries and benefits and all lease obligation and closing costs are included in general and administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income.
The following table displays the activity and balances of the restructuring reserves in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):
Hub | Hub | Mode | Hub | |||||||||||||||||
Headcount | Consolidation | Hub | Headcount | Group | ||||||||||||||||
Reduction | of Facilities | Total | Reduction | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 364 | $ | 137 | $ | 501 | $ | 113 | $ | 614 | ||||||||||
Restructuring expenses |
9 | 23 | 32 | | 32 | |||||||||||||||
Change in estimate |
(39 | ) | (23 | ) | (62 | ) | (2 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash payments made |
(109 | ) | (41 | ) | (150 | ) | (90 | ) | (240 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
$ | 225 | $ | 96 | $ | 321 | $ | 21 | $ | 342 | ||||||||||
Restructuring expenses |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Change in estimate |
(9 | ) | (49 | ) | (58 | ) | 1 | (57 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash payments made |
(211 | ) | (23 | ) | (234 | ) | (6 | ) | (240 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2012 |
$ | 5 | $ | 24 | $ | 29 | $ | 16 | $ | 45 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6. Fair Value Measurement
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 due to their short-term nature.
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2011 included $42.5 million invested in a money market fund comprised of U.S. treasury securities and repurchase agreements for these securities.
Restricted investments included $15.4 million and $14.3 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, of mutual funds which are reported at fair value.
The fair value measurement of cash equivalents and restricted investments is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets which are defined as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Codification.
9
NOTE 7. Capital Lease and Financing Arrangements
We have standby letters of credit that expire at various dates in 2012 and 2013. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding letters of credit totaled $2.6 million.
We had $47.4 million of unused and available borrowings under our bank revolving line of credit as of June 30, 2012. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of June 30, 2012.
Beginning August 1, 2011, we entered into an agreement to lease 3,126 chassis for a period of 10 years. We are accounting for this lease as a capital lease. Interest on this capital lease obligation is based on interest rates that approximate currently available interest rates.
We paid interest of $0.2 million related to this capital lease during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and $0.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
NOTE 8. Guarantees
As a recruiting tool and a benefit to our owner-operators, we are guaranteeing certain owner-operators lease payments for tractors. The guarantees expire at various dates beginning in 2012 through 2018.
The potential maximum exposure under these lease guarantees was approximately $40.0 million and $24.0 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The potential maximum exposure represents the amount of the remaining lease payments on all outstanding guaranteed leases as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. However, upon default, we have the option to purchase the tractors. We could then sell the tractors and use the proceeds to recover all or a portion of the amounts paid under the guarantees. Alternatively, we can contract with another owner-operator who would assume the lease. There were no material defaults during the periods ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and no potential material defaults.
We had a liability of approximately $0.8 million as of June 30, 2012 and $0.5 million as of December 31, 2011, representing the fair value for estimated defaults of the guarantees, based on a discounted cash-flow analysis which is included in current and non-current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We are amortizing the amounts over the remaining lives of the respective guarantees.
NOTE 9. Commitments and Contingencies
We have entered into equipment purchase contracts for the acquisition of 2,100 53 containers. We expect the total cost of purchasing the containers to be approximately $24.1 million. We expect to take delivery of the equipment between July and October 2012.
NOTE 10. Legal Matters
We are a party to litigation incident to our business, including bankruptcy preference claims, claims for personal injury and/or property damage, freight lost or damaged in transit, improperly shipped or improperly billed. Some of the lawsuits to which we are party are covered by insurance and are being defended by our insurance carriers. Some of the lawsuits are not covered by insurance and we defend those ourselves. We do not believe that the outcome of this litigation will have a materially adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
10
NOTE 11. New Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Topic 820Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures of the Accounting Standards Codification. This update provides guidance on how fair value accounting should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards. The guidance does not extend the use of fair value accounting. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2012, as required, and the adoption did not have a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to Topic 220Comprehensive Income of the Accounting Standards Codification. The update is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in the financial statements. The guidance requires that we present components of comprehensive income in either one continuous or two separate, but consecutive, financial statements and no longer permits the presentation of comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity. We adopted this new guidance effective January 1, 2012, as required. The adoption did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. We are now presenting components of comprehensive income on one statement, our unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income.
11
HUB GROUP, INC.
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The information contained in this quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expects, hopes, believes, intends, estimates, anticipates, and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and subject to risks. Such statements should be viewed with caution. Actual results or experience could differ materially from the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors. We assume no liability to update any such forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially include:
| the degree and rate of market growth in the domestic intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics markets served by us; |
| deterioration in our relationships with existing railroads or adverse changes to the railroads operating rules; |
| changes in rail service conditions or adverse weather conditions; |
| further consolidation of railroads; |
| the impact of competitive pressures in the marketplace, including entry of new competitors, direct marketing efforts by the railroads or marketing efforts of asset-based carriers; |
| changes in rail, drayage and trucking company capacity; |
| railroads moving away from ownership of intermodal assets; |
| equipment shortages or equipment surplus; |
| changes in the cost of services from rail, drayage, truck or other vendors; |
| increases in costs for independent contractors due to regulatory, judicial and legal changes; |
| labor unrest in the rail, drayage or trucking company communities; |
| general economic and business conditions; |
| inability to successfully protect our data against cyber attacks; |
| significant deterioration in our customers financial condition, particularly in the retail, consumer products and durable goods sectors; |
| fuel shortages or fluctuations in fuel prices; |
| increases in interest rates; |
| changes in homeland security or terrorist activity; |
| difficulties in maintaining or enhancing our information technology systems; |
| changes to or new governmental regulations; |
| significant increases to health insurance costs due to the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010; |
| loss of several of our largest customers and Mode agents; |
| inability to recruit and retain key personnel and Mode sales agents and IBOs; |
| inability to recruit and maintain drivers and owner-operators; |
| changes in insurance costs and claims expense; |
| changes to current laws which will aid union organizing efforts; and |
| inability to close and successfully integrate any future business combinations, including Mode. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hub Group, Inc. (we, us or our) now reports two distinct business segments, Hub and Mode. The Mode segment includes only the business we acquired on April 1, 2011. The Hub segment includes all business other than Mode. Hub Group (as opposed to just Hub), refers to the consolidated results for the whole company, including both the Mode and Hub segments. For the segment financial results, refer to Note 3.
12
We are the largest intermodal marketing company (IMC) in the United States and a full service transportation provider offering intermodal, truck brokerage and logistics services. We operate through a nationwide network of operating centers and independent business owners.
As an IMC, we arrange for the movement of our customers freight in containers and trailers over long distances. We contract with railroads to provide transportation for the long-haul portion of the shipment and with local trucking companies, known as drayage companies, for local pickup and delivery. As part of the intermodal services, we negotiate rail and drayage rates, electronically track shipments in transit, consolidate billing and handle claims for freight loss or damage on behalf of our customers.
Approximately 64% of the Hub segments drayage services are provided by our subsidiary, Comtrak Logistics, Inc. (Comtrak), which assists us in providing reliable, cost effective intermodal services to our customers. Comtrak has terminals in Atlanta, Birmingham, Charleston, Charlotte, Chattanooga, Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus (OH), Dallas, Harrisburg, Huntsville, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Memphis, Nashville, Newark, Los Angeles, Perry (FL), Philadelphia, Savannah, Seattle, St. Louis, Stockton, and Titusville (FL). As of June 30, 2012, Comtrak owned 277 tractors, leased or owned 448 trailers, employed 241 drivers and contracted with 2,073 owner-operators.
We also arrange for the transportation of freight by truck, providing customers with another option for their transportation needs. We match the customers needs with carriers capacity to provide the most effective service and price combinations. As part of our truck brokerage services, we negotiate rates, track shipments in transit and handle claims for freight loss or damage on behalf of our customers.
Our logistics service consists of complex transportation management services, including load consolidation, mode optimization and carrier management. These service offerings are designed to take advantage of the increasing trend for shippers to outsource all or a greater portion of their transportation needs.
Hub has full time marketing representatives throughout North America who service local, regional and national accounts. We believe that fostering long-term customer relationships is critical to our success and allows us to better understand our customers needs and specifically tailor our transportation services to them.
Hubs yield management group works with pricing and operations to enhance Hubs customer margins. We are working on margin enhancement projects including matching up inbound and outbound loads, reducing empty miles, improving our recovery of accessorial costs, using Comtrak more, and reviewing and improving low margin loads, lanes and customers.
Hubs top 50 customers represent approximately 62% of the Hub segment revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012. We use various performance indicators to manage our business. We closely monitor margin and gains and losses for our top 50 customers. We also evaluate on-time performance, cost per load and daily sales outstanding by customer account. Vendor cost changes and vendor service issues are also monitored closely.
Mode has approximately 95 Independent Business Owners IBOs who sell and operate the business throughout North America and 125 sales only agents. Mode also has a company managed operation and corporate offices in Dallas, a temperature protected services division, Temstar, located in Downers Grove, IL and corporate offices in Memphis. Modes top 20 customers represent approximately 38% of the Mode segment revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012. We closely monitor revenue and margin for these customers.
13
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
The following table summarizes our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands) for the three months ended June 30:
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2012 | Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hub | Mode | Inter- Segment Elims |
Hub Group Total |
Hub | Mode | Inter- Segment Elims |
Hub Group Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intermodal |
$ | 431,894 | $ | 86,048 | $ | (10,931 | ) | $ | 507,011 | $ | 396,298 | $ | 85,150 | $ | (2,092 | ) | $ | 479,356 | ||||||||||||||
Truck brokerage |
80,094 | 81,379 | (581 | ) | 160,892 | 89,764 | 81,180 | (373 | ) | 170,571 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Logistics |
83,900 | 26,865 | (356 | ) | 110,409 | 74,356 | 26,918 | | 101,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 595,888 | $ | 194,292 | $ | (11,868 | ) | $ | 778,312 | $ | 560,418 | $ | 193,248 | $ | (2,465 | ) | $ | 751,201 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Hub Groups revenue increased 3.6% to $778.3 million in 2012 from $751.2 million in 2011.
The Hub segment revenue increased 6.3% to $595.9 million. Hub intermodal revenue increased 9% to $431.9 million due to a 9% increase in loads. Higher prices were offset by lower fuel and mix. Hub truck brokerage revenue decreased 11% to $80.1 million due to a 7% shorter length of haul, lower fuel and a 1% decrease in loads. The truck brokerage market is challenging due to increased competition, muted overall macro demand and a generally balanced truckload market. Hub logistics revenue increased 13% to $83.9 million related primarily to a combination of existing and new customer growth.
Mode revenue increased 0.5% to $194.3 million in 2012 from $193.2 million in 2011. Mode business was relatively flat across all three business lines.
Gross Margin
Hub Groups gross margin increased 3.1% to $87.4 million in 2012 from $84.7 million in 2011.
The Hub segment gross margin increased 3.6% to $64.8 million. Hubs $2.2 million margin increase is due primarily to growth in intermodal margin. Intermodal margin growth came primarily from 9% volume growth. In addition, price increases, turning our containers more quickly and doing more of our own drayage also contributed to the increase in margin. We have 495 more drivers than we had at this time last year. Logistics margin increased by $0.5 million and truck brokerage margin decreased by $0.8 million. Hubs gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased to 10.9% as compared to last years 11.2% margin. This decrease is due to lower intermodal and logistics yields.
Modes gross margin increased 1.8% to $22.6 million in 2012 from $22.1 million in 2011 due to an increase in yields in all service lines. Modes gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 11.6% in 2012 from 11.5% in 2011.
14
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING EXPENSES
The following table includes certain items in the consolidated statements of income as a percentage of revenue:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenue |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Transportation costs |
88.8 | 88.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross margin |
11.2 | 11.3 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
4.0 | 4.4 | ||||||
Agent fees and commissions |
1.8 | 1.8 | ||||||
General and administrative |
1.6 | 1.7 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total costs and expenses |
7.6 | 8.1 | ||||||
Operating income |
3.6 | 3.2 |
Salaries and Benefits
As a percentage of revenue, Hub Groups salaries and benefits decreased to 4.0% in 2012 from 4.4% in 2011 due to increased revenue and lower salary and benefit costs due to lower bonus expense in 2012. Hub Groups salaries and benefits decreased to $31.4 million in 2012 from $32.7 million in 2011. The decrease in employee bonuses of $2.4 million was partially offset by an increase in salaries and benefits of $1.1 million.
The Hub segment decrease of $0.5 million was due to decreases in employee bonuses of $2.3 million and commissions of $0.2 million. These decreases were partially offset by increases in salaries expense of $1.6 million, compensation related to restricted stock awards of $0.3 million and employee benefits of $0.1 million. The increase in salaries is primarily the result of merit increases and a headcount increase of 101 employees.
Modes salaries and benefits expense decreased to $3.8 million in 2012 from $4.6 million in 2011. The decrease was due to the 2011 restructuring plan.
Hub Groups headcount as of June 30, 2012 was 1,362, which excludes drivers, as driver costs are included in transportation costs.
Agent Fees and Commissions
Hub Groups agent fees and commissions expenses decreased to $13.6 million in 2012 from $13.8 million in 2011. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses remained consistent at 1.8% in 2012 and 2011.
General and Administrative
Hub Groups general and administrative expenses decreased to $12.7 million in 2012 from $12.9 million in 2011. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses decreased slightly to 1.6% in 2012 from 1.7% in 2011.
The Hub segment increase of $0.4 million was due primarily to increases in outside consultant expenses of $0.5 million and employee training of $0.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in office and rent expense of $0.2 million and equipment lease expense of $0.1 million.
15
Modes general and administrative expenses decreased to $2.0 million in 2012 from $2.6 million in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the reduction of rent expense from the relocation of our Mode Memphis office to our Comtrak Memphis location. Mode had $0.3 million of integration costs in 2011 that did not reoccur in 2012.
Depreciation and Amortization
Hub Groups depreciation and amortization increased to $1.7 million in 2012 from $1.5 million in 2011. The increase in expense was primarily related to the addition of new furniture and fixtures and computer hardware and software.
This expense as a percentage of revenue remained constant at 0.2% in both 2012 and 2011.
Other Income (Expense)
Hub Groups interest expense increased to $0.3 million in 2012 from $0.1 million in 2011. This increase was due primarily to interest on capital leases for chassis.
Interest and dividend income remained consistent in 2012 and 2011.
Other income decreased to $0.02 million of expense in 2012 from $0.06 million of income in 2011. The decrease in other income was primarily due to currency translation loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 while there was a gain in 2011.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased to $10.6 million in 2012 from $9.6 million in 2011. Our 2012 increase in pretax income more than offset our lower 2012 effective tax rate. Our effective rate was 38.5% in 2012 and 39.9% in 2011. The 2011 rate was higher primarily due to the impact of the Mode acquisition in 2011 on our deferred tax liability.
Net Income
Net income increased to $17.0 million in 2012 from $14.4 million in 2011 due primarily to higher gross margin at both the Hub and Mode segments and lower costs and expenses at the Mode segment.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share were $0.46 in 2012 and $0.39 in 2011. Basic earnings per share increased primarily due to the increase in net income.
Diluted earnings per share were $0.46 in 2012 and $0.39 in 2011. Diluted earnings per share increased primarily due to the increase in net income.
16
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
The following table summarizes our revenue by segment and business line (in thousands) for the six months ended June 30:
Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2012 | Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hub | Mode | Inter- Segment Elims |
Hub Group Total |
Hub | Mode | Inter- Segment Elims |
Hub Group Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intermodal |
$ | 836,064 | $ | 168,270 | $ | (20,173 | ) | $ | 984,161 | $ | 732,979 | $ | 85,150 | $ | (2,092 | ) | $ | 816,037 | ||||||||||||||
Truck brokerage |
160,118 | 161,316 | (1,543 | ) | 319,891 | 174,450 | 81,180 | (373 | ) | 255,257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Logistics |
162,918 | 51,889 | (662 | ) | 214,145 | 138,368 | 26,918 | | 165,286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 1,159,100 | $ | 381,475 | $ | (22,378 | ) | $ | 1,518,197 | $ | 1,045,797 | $ | 193,248 | $ | (2,465 | ) | $ | 1,236,580 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Hub Groups revenue increased 22.8% to $1.5 billion in 2012 from $1.2 billion in 2011.
The Hub segment revenue increased 10.8% to $1.2 billion. Hub intermodal revenue increased 14% to $836.1 million due to a 12% increase in loads and an increase for fuel and prices offset by lower mix. Hub truck brokerage revenue decreased 8% to $160.1 million due to a 6% shorter length of haul and a 2% decrease in loads. Hub logistics revenue increased 18% to $162.9 million related primarily to a combination of existing and new customer growth.
The Mode segment revenue was $381.5 million which increased from $193.2 million due to being owned by Hub Group for the full six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011.
Gross Margin
Hub Group gross margin increased 20.5% to $171.1 million in 2012 from $142.0 million in 2011.
The Hub segment gross margin increased 5.4% to $126.3 million. Hubs $6.4 million gross margin increase came primarily from Hub intermodal. Hub intermodal margin grew primarily due to 12% volume growth. In addition, we performed more of our own drayage, improved equipment utilization and increased prices, which contributed to the margin growth. As a percentage of Hub segment revenue, gross margin decreased to 10.9% in 2012 from 11.5% in 2011. This decrease is due to intermodal yield being down since we had higher than anticipated cost increases from certain key carriers, fuel cost increases and due to logistics yield being down since we are doing more transactional as opposed to management fee business.
The Mode segment gross margin for the period was $44.8 million, which is 11.7% as a percentage of Modes revenue. The increase in gross margin is primarily due to Mode being owned by Hub Group for the six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011.
17
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING EXPENSES
The following table includes certain items in the consolidated statements of income as a percentage of revenue:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenue |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Transportation costs |
88.7 | 88.5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross margin |
11.3 | 11.5 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
4.3 | 4.8 | ||||||
Agent fees and commissions |
1.8 | 1.2 | ||||||
General and administrative |
1.7 | 2.0 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total costs and expenses |
8.0 | 8.2 | ||||||
Operating income |
3.3 | 3.3 |
Salaries and Benefits
Hub Groups salaries and benefits increased to $64.7 million in 2012 from $59.5 million in 2011. As a percentage of revenue, salaries and benefits decreased to 4.3% in 2012 from 4.8% in 2011 due to increased revenue and the inclusion of Mode for the full six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011. Modes business model of using IBOs to market and operate their freight versus Hubs employee model lowered salaries and benefit expense as a percentage of revenue.
The Hub segment salaries and benefits increase of $1.8 million was due primarily to increases in salaries of $3.0 million, compensation related to restricted stock awards of $0.6 million, employee benefits of $0.1 million and payroll tax expense of $0.1 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in employee bonuses of $1.7 million and commissions of $0.3 million.
As Mode was owned by Hub Group for six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011, Modes expense increased $3.5 million year over year.
Agent Fees and Commissions
Hub Groups agent fees and commissions expenses increased to $27.3 million in 2012 from $14.5 million in 2011. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses increased to 1.8% in 2012 from 1.2% in 2011. The increase in expense and the percentage of revenue was primarily related to the April 1, 2011 acquisition of Mode and Modes IBO model being included for the full six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011.
General and Administrative
Hub Groups general and administrative expenses increased to $25.3 million in 2012 from $24.9 million in 2011. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses decreased to 1.7% in 2012 from 2.0% in 2011.
18
The Hub segment decrease of $0.9 million was due primarily to $1.7 million of expenses associated with the Mode acquisition purchase in 2011 that did not reoccur in 2012, partially offset by an increase in outside consultant expenses of $0.9 million.
The increase in expense related to Mode was approximately $1.3 million due to Mode being included for the full six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization
Hub Groups depreciation and amortization increased to $3.4 million in 2012 from $2.4 million in 2011. This expense as a percentage of revenue remained constant at 0.2% in both 2012 and 2011.
The increase in expense was related to Mode being owned by Hub Group for six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011 and more depreciation related to the addition of computer hardware and software, leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures.
Other Income (Expense)
Hub Groups interest expense increased to $0.6 million in 2012 from $0.1 million in 2011. This increase was due primarily to interest on capital leases for chassis.
Interest and dividend income remained consistent in 2012 and 2011.
Other income decreased to $0.04 million of expense in 2012 from $0.3 million of income in 2011. The decrease in other income was primarily due to currency translation loss for 2012 while there was a gain in 2011.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased to $19.2 million in 2012 from $16.1 million in 2011. Our 2012 increase in pretax income more than offset our lower 2012 effective tax rate. Our effective rate was 38.5% in 2012 and 39.2% in 2011. The 2011 rate was higher primarily due to the impact of 2011 acquisitions on our deferred tax liability.
Net Income
Net income increased to $30.6 million in 2012 from $24.9 million in 2011 due primarily to higher gross margin and due to Mode being included for the full six months in 2012 versus three months in 2011.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share increased to $0.83 in 2012 from $0.67 in 2011. Basic earnings per share increased primarily due to the increase in net income.
Diluted earnings per share increased to $0.82 in 2012 from $0.67 in 2011. Diluted earnings per share increased primarily due to the increase in net income.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During the first half of 2012, we have funded operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions and stock purchases related to employee withholding upon vesting of restricted stock with cash flows from operations.
Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $26.1 million, which resulted primarily from income of $30.6 million and adjustments for non-cash charges of $18.5 million partially offset by the change in operating assets and liabilities of $23.0 million.
19
The Mode acquisition has negatively affected our operating cash flows as the Mode business model has a larger variance between days payable outstanding and days sales outstanding than the Hub segment has historically experienced.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $20.7 million and related primarily to the purchase of land for our new corporate headquarters of $10.0 million, containers and transportation equipment of $4.5 million, computer related hardware and software of $4.3 million and leasehold improvements of $1.4 million. We expect capital expenditures to be between $60 million and $70 million in 2012. Between $20 million and $30 million is for our corporate headquarters, which is a two year project. Another $26 million is for containers, $2 million is for replacements of refrigerated trailers and the majority of the remainder is for technology related investments.
The net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $2.3 million. We used $1.8 million of cash to purchase treasury stock for payments of withholding taxes related to stock compensation, $1.1 million for capital lease payments and reported $0.5 million of excess tax benefits from share-based compensation as a financing cash in-flow.
We have standby letters of credit that expire at various dates in 2012 and 2013. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding letters of credit totaled $2.6 million.
We had $47.4 million of unused and available borrowings under our bank revolving line of credit as of June 30, 2012. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of June 30, 2012.
We believe that our cash, cash flow from operations and borrowings available under our Credit Agreement will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at least the next twelve months.
Item 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates on our bank line of credit which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
As of June 30, 2012, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012. Except as set forth below, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with such evaluation that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
On April 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Mode. We are currently integrating processes, employees, technologies and operations. Management will continue to evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting as we complete our integration.
Item 6. | EXHIBITS |
The exhibits included as part of the Form 10-Q are set forth in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such Exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference.
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
HUB GROUP, INC. | ||
DATE: August 1, 2012 |
/s/ Terri A. Pizzuto | |
Terri A. Pizzuto | ||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial | ||
Officer and Treasurer | ||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
21
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
31.1 | Certification of David P. Yeager, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Terri A. Pizzuto, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of David P. Yeager and Terri A. Pizzuto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
101 | The following financial statements and footnotes from the Hub Group Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income; (iii) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. |
22
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, David P. Yeager, certify that:
1) | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Hub Group, Inc.; |
2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4) | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting and; |
5) | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 1, 2012
/s/ David P.Yeager |
Name: David P. Yeager |
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Terri A. Pizzuto, certify that:
1) | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Hub Group, Inc.; |
2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4) | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting and; |
5) | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 1, 2012
/s/ Terri A. Pizzuto |
Name: Terri A. Pizzuto |
Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 of Hub Group, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.
Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hub Group, Inc.
/s/ David P.Yeager | /s/ Terri A. Pizzuto | |||
David P. Yeager | Terri A. Pizzuto | |||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Hub Group, Inc. |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |||
Hub Group, Inc. |